
The Democrats’ hysteric reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision staying premature litigation against a presidential order that might eventually regulate mail-in ballots is unsurprising. From Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s over-wrought dissent alleging the result will be "chaos" and Time magazine’s twaddle that the high court is "rigging" the elections, to blather about Trump subverting the Constitution, the reactions are unmoored from reality.
Trending
- How U.S. immigration policy remains consistently inconsistent
- ‘South Park’ is now ‘South America’ in dig at Apple and Google for observing Trump’s Lake Ontario order
- Nevaeh Akira Shares Apologetic Message To Blueface
- Michigan-Western Michigan Controversy Isn’t Over as MAC Files NCAA Appeal
- US slaps import ban on Canadian alcohol, motorbikes and other goods
- Georgia Is Spending More on Lethal Injections, Records Reveal — ProPublica
- Watch Kalan.FrFr Explore ‘How LA Found Its Sound.’
- Chronic Inflammation: Understanding the Link Behind Arthritis, Cancer, and Heart Disease